Listen Live
Donate
 on air
Schedule

KCRW

Read & Explore

  • News
  • Entertainment
  • Food
  • Culture
  • Events

Listen

  • Live Radio
  • Music
  • Podcasts
  • Full Schedule

Information

  • About
  • Careers
  • Help / FAQ
  • Newsletters
  • Contact

Support

  • Become a Member
  • Become a VIP
  • Ways to Give
  • Shop
  • Member Perks

Become a Member

Donate to KCRW to support this cultural hub for music discovery, in-depth journalism, community storytelling, and free events. You'll become a KCRW Member and get a year of exclusive benefits.

DonateGive Monthly

Copyright 2026 KCRW. All rights reserved.

Report a Bug|Privacy Policy|Terms of Service|
Cookie Policy
|FCC Public Files

Back to To the Point

To the Point

The Future of the Supreme Court

Sometimes a president's most lasting impact is his Supreme Court appointees. States' rights, affirmative action and abortion could be at stake if justices act as they're expected. Yet lifetime appointees often defy those who name them. While they deny they'll use a "litmus test," Gore and Bush have sent signals about their choices to lead the third branch of government. Two former supreme court clerks, leaders of liberal and conservative public interest organizations, and a reporter who covers the Texas legal system ponder upcoming vacancies, who the candidates would likely appoint, and whether the new justices would perform as expected. Newsmaker: Efforts for an Israeli-Palestinian peace were jarred today by a car bomb in Jerusalem that killed 2 and injured 10. But says Cameron Barr, Middle East correspondent for the Christian Science Monitor, even that hasn't derailed the attempt to halt such violence. He speaks with us from Jerusalem about restraint, frustration, and hopeful signs. Reporter's Notebook: Some 31 years after he leaked the Pentagon Papers to a Senate committee and profoundly influenced the conduct of the Vietnam War, Daniel Ellsberg alerts us to a bill on President Clinton's desk that would criminalize actions like his and force journalists to reveal sources.

  • rss
  • Share
By Warren Olney • Nov 2, 2000 • 1 min read

Sometimes a president's most lasting impact is his Supreme Court appointees. States' rights, affirmative action and abortion could be at stake if justices act as they're expected. Yet lifetime appointees often defy those who name them. While they deny they'll use a "litmus test," Gore and Bush have sent signals about their choices to lead the third branch of government. Two former supreme court clerks, leaders of liberal and conservative public interest organizations, and a reporter who covers the Texas legal system ponder upcoming vacancies, who the candidates would likely appoint, and whether the new justices would perform as expected.

  • Newsmaker: Efforts for an Israeli-Palestinian peace were jarred today by a car bomb in Jerusalem that killed 2 and injured 10. But says Cameron Barr, Middle East correspondent for the

    Christian Science Monitor, even that hasn't derailed the attempt to halt such violence. He speaks with us from Jerusalem about restraint, frustration, and hopeful signs.

  • Reporter's Notebook: Some 31 years after he leaked the Pentagon Papers to a Senate committee and profoundly influenced the conduct of the Vietnam War, Daniel Ellsberg alerts us to a bill on President Clinton's desk that would criminalize actions like his and force journalists to reveal sources.

People for the American Way

Institute for Justice

Volokh's op-ed article

  • https://images.ctfassets.net/2658fe8gbo8o/AvYox6VuEgcxpd20Xo9d3/769bca4fbf97bf022190f4813812c1e2/new-default.jpg?h=250

    Warren Olney

    former KCRW broadcaster

    NewsNationalPolitics
Back to To the Point